Some commandments ezi and prohibitions ezi may already be a person? It turns out that very many ... in addition to all the usual fixed precepts, commandments all the details, one can charge itself or ban on a particular act, as we learn affair vows, opening headquarters affair "that Idr a vow to God or seven oath he chained Asr for his life, will not speak as Hitza mouth will do. "For example: who vowed not to eat apples, not allowed to eat apples, the prohibition ezi in the Torah! Who swore eat an apple and ate, had a Torah prohibition. And who vowed to bring an offering or donate a charity, committed to the Torah to have his vow. man, man and woman
Where due vow? Exact words that open the case of vows: "A Leader vow ... and a woman that frequency." One word expresses the unique private person, compared to human word is also used as a general kind of person at all, and therefore no division into male and female, and both together are called man, "male and female He created them ... and called their name Adam" [1]. On the other hand, the man is a partner of the woman - a distinct personality which has a clear division of he and she.
More specifically the first appearance of man and woman in the Torah [2]: E lethargic man, then "He ezi built the Lord God took the rib which he took from man to woman and brought her to the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones ... she shall be called woman because of a she was taken it. Hence a man leaves his father ezi and mother and clings to his wife, and were in one flesh. " The creation of the woman, the man still called upon, and only after he sees the woman he calls her name and in the process he discovers his name is one (after the word woman appears already two times [3]).
That is, at first mind is the 'man', no division of male and female, and in the words of the Sages that man was created "two faces" [4], is included male and female. So H'nsira occurs, when the woman is taken from Adam's rib, with the aim of Create pairing "face to face" of man and woman. So when a person sees before him the woman he identifies himself as, and then revealed the meaning completion of the pairing process which leaves' man, his parents and glue 'Woman'.
Name a person belongs more to the world H'mohin, while a field H'mdot name - admiring heart Sizes and enthusiastic about fire. Relative, the man identifies more with the world-mindedness, and the woman with the world of attributes. So initially the person does not know himself as (or woman), and only when he sees before him the woman he feels admiration of his heart at her, "This is the time bone of my bones," my heart at her, and reveals himself as a man with a heart (and by implication: Man sees before him a woman, then he does his which equals: Adam and another woman = Back [she was taken so]). Men and women of vows
Now go back affair vows. Like the woman at first, "she was taken" man, woman like that vows are taken Mandrie man - initially "a vow that Wieder" then "and a woman that frequency." Required (and week) expresses feature 'masculine', lack of acceptance of reality, but rather difficult and combative, confrontational and harsh, "I can not do that" or "I have to do so", while a tendency to argue and win. "The man and there is no way to take a woman through her conquer" ezi [5], the man speaks ezi and the woman is difficult to say the soft [6]. So when the woman vows, thus mimicking the man feature, the ability to hand the father or husband to break the vows, to prevent it from determining binding decisions without the consent [7].
In a relationship, can be understood simply vows can cause tensions and problems safely home. Indeed, the husband violates Jewish law says vows of "mental torture" or "between ezi them" [8] - vows who hurt proper management of family life. Depth, the problem starts actually the woman's tendency ezi to behave Landor and hard and tough nature (such as "stronger sex"), ezi and that it violates ezi her femininity soft and beautiful. Non-calculated tendency of women Landor liable to repay it when faced with difficulties and temptations, and will be required effort is not by its forces.
When the husband violates (crumbled) the vow, is this tendency balance and helps the woman to be herself again. Thus restoring the correct structure at home - a house with a man and a woman, each of his character, and together they can connect "face to face", "and cleaves to his wife and they become one flesh" and get to breed [9]. One manifestation of this vow and oath create a Block in the family, there Sages "at ezi squatting child, jumping and swear not right place for her husband" ezi [10] This is why the victim gives birth - but this is not an ordinary oath, but psychological tendency that God heals itself and as violating her oath in order to continue ezi reproduction.
If, however, the woman saw a real need to make decisions and certain safeguards, it must do so "God willing" and commitment (as it is written in Jewish law, which also applies to men), while listening to reality rather than fight. When the woman would play soft, as nature, without the declaration of a vow, she will find the strength to face the temptations internal and find the inner strength that can withstand any shock [11]. Personal and feminine vow
Go back to the words man and woman and exact vow is a personal matter. Have paved the way for many, observing Torah requires everyone. This regular religious ezi law, an objective interest in so far as it is written for everyone equal: all must observe the Sabbath ezi and dietary laws, every man has to put on tefillin every woman light Shabbat ezi candles. The table is set, essentially, facing vastly worth every Jew (although it has a difference of steps between the binding rules stringencies and hardware). Sometimes enough, no special need to express my special personality to your.
But sometimes wake up in person - rather, ezi the man wakes up - and feel the need to express his personal interest, subjective. The man feels 'must' do something specific, or actually "forbidden" him to do, and then he felt the need to take a vow and oath. General theory belongs to everyone, and usually it belongs anywhere, anytime, but vows theory is completely personal inclination, what I feel right now.
Thus understood the special opening of the case, "Moses spoke to the heads of the tribes" - not
No comments:
Post a Comment